Bal\u0131kesir\u2019de bir i\u015f yerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7i ile vardiya amiri aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan tart\u0131\u015fma, yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131nan bir i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma s\u00fcrecine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Dosyaya yans\u0131yan bilgilere g\u00f6re i\u015f\u00e7i, kendisine adil davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vardiya amirinin ba\u015f\u0131na elindeki bir cisimle vurdu. Ya\u015fanan olay\u0131n ard\u0131ndan i\u015fveren, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini tazminat \u00f6demeden feshetti.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7i, k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret etmedi\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen vardiya amirinin tehditvari \u015fekilde konu\u015farak \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc savundu. Fiziki m\u00fcdahalesinin kendisini korumaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren i\u015f\u00e7i, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen feshin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu iddia etti.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fveren ise olay\u0131n tutanak alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ya\u015fananlara ili\u015fkin tan\u0131klar\u0131n bulundu\u011funu belirterek davan\u0131n reddini istedi.<\/p>\n Davaya i\u015f mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla bakan Kepsut Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/strong>, kavgan\u0131n kim taraf\u0131ndan ve hangi nedenle ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesin bi\u00e7imde belirlenemedi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca haks\u0131z tahrik ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek i\u015fverenin hakl\u0131 fesih yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131.<\/p>\n Bu gerek\u00e7elerle dava kabul edildi ve i\u015f\u00e7iye k\u0131dem ile ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmesine<\/strong> karar verildi.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fverenin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine dosya Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan incelendi.<\/p>\n \u0130stinaf mahkemesi, i\u015f\u00e7inin vardiya amirine y\u00f6nelik fiziki sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u201csata\u015fma\u201d kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fine<\/strong> h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle i\u015fveren a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 fesih \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funa karar veren daire, yerel mahkemenin i\u015f\u00e7iye k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin karar\u0131 temyiz etmesi \u00fczerine dosya Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesine<\/strong> ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131, dosyada bulunan belgeleri, uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecini birlikte de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011funa<\/strong> h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc itirazlar\u0131n karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek istinaf karar\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onand\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n B\u00f6ylece i\u015f yerindeki tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda i\u015f arkada\u015f\u0131na fiziki sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n tazminats\u0131z i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu kesinle\u015fmi\u015f oldu.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi, i\u015f yerinde ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda vardiya amirine fiziki sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunan i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin tazminats\u0131z feshedilmesini hukuka uygun buldu. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, istinaf\u0131n i\u015fveren lehine verdi\u011fi karar\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onad\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":48649,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[7610,14899,8767,1275],"class_list":["post-48648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-ve-isci-bulma","tag-isci","tag-ishukuku","tag-tazminat","tag-yargitay"],"yoast_head":"\n\u0130\u015f\u00e7i k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 istedi<\/h3>\n
Yerel mahkeme i\u015f\u00e7iyi hakl\u0131 buldu<\/h3>\n
\u0130stinaf karar\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirdi<\/h3>\n
Son s\u00f6z\u00fc Yarg\u0131tay s\u00f6yledi<\/h3>\n