Yoksulluk ve geri kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k, yaln\u0131zca kaynak k\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcme eksikli\u011fiyle a\u00e7\u0131klanamayacak kadar \u00e7ok katmanl\u0131 ve s\u00fcreklilik arz eden toplumsal olgulard\u0131r. Modern toplumlarda yoksullu\u011fun s\u00fcreklili\u011fi, zenginli\u011fin \u00fcretimi, b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc ve yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc belirleyen kurumsal ve siyasal iktidar ili\u015fkileriyle yak\u0131ndan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Bu analiz, yoksullu\u011fun yaln\u0131zca gelir eksikli\u011fiyle de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda kapasite yoksunlu\u011fu, g\u00f6reli yoksunluk, d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131, \u00e7\u0131kar koalisyonlar\u0131, emek piyasas\u0131nda g\u00fcvencesizle\u015fme ve me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rma anlat\u0131lar\u0131yla nas\u0131l yeniden \u00fcretildi\u011fini T\u00fcrkiye \u00f6rne\u011fi \u00fczerinden tart\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u011flamda, 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de belirlenen asgari \u00fccret d\u00fczeyi, T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e\u2019in a\u00e7l\u0131k ve yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 verileriyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak de\u011ferlendirilecek; enflasyon, ge\u00e7im maliyeti ve reel \u00fccret dinamikleri \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011funun s\u00fcreklili\u011fi analiz edilecektir. Ayr\u0131ca, kurumsal iktisat, d\u00fcnya-sistem teorisi, sembolik \u015fiddet, teodise ve dinin\/k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gibi teorik \u00e7er\u00e7evelerle yoksullu\u011fun nas\u0131l me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00f6netildi\u011fi incelenecektir. Analiz, OECD ve IMF gibi uluslararas\u0131 kurulu\u015flar\u0131n e\u015fitsizlik ve b\u00fcy\u00fcme ili\u015fkisine dair bulgular\u0131n\u0131 da kapsayacak, g\u00fcncel ampirik verilerle desteklenecek ve politika \u00f6nerileriyle sonland\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yoksulluk ve Geri Kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k: Kavramsal ve Teorik Yakla\u015f\u0131mlar<\/strong><\/p>\n Yoksullu\u011fun \u00c7ok Boyutlu Tan\u0131m\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Yoksulluk, yaln\u0131zca gelir eksikli\u011fiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmayan, bireylerin ve hanelerin temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layamama durumunu ifade eden \u00e7ok boyutlu bir olgudur. D\u00fcnya Bankas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n tan\u0131m\u0131na g\u00f6re yoksulluk, asgari ya\u015fam standard\u0131na eri\u015fememe halidir; bu yaln\u0131zca maddi yoksunluk de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k, bar\u0131nma ve toplumsal kat\u0131l\u0131m gibi alanlarda da yoksunlu\u011fu i\u00e7erir. Mutlak yoksulluk, temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanamamas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelirken; g\u00f6reli yoksulluk, bireylerin toplumun genel refah d\u00fczeyinin alt\u0131nda ya\u015famas\u0131yla ilgilidir. Amartya Sen\u2019in kapasite yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ise yoksullu\u011fu, bireylerin ya\u015famlar\u0131n\u0131 anlaml\u0131 k\u0131lacak f\u0131rsatlara eri\u015fememesi olarak tan\u0131mlar; bu, yoksullu\u011fun yaln\u0131zca ekonomik de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda sosyal ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel boyutlar\u0131n\u0131 da vurgular.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de yoksulluk, T\u00dc\u0130K ve T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e gibi kurumlar taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7l\u0131k ve yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131, g\u00f6reli yoksulluk oran\u0131, insani yoksulluk gibi g\u00f6stergelerle \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclmektedir. A\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131, d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli beslenmesi i\u00e7in yapmas\u0131 gereken asgari g\u0131da harcamas\u0131n\u0131; yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ise g\u0131da harcamalar\u0131na ek olarak bar\u0131nma, ula\u015f\u0131m, e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k gibi t\u00fcm temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n toplam\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder.<\/p>\n Geri Kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k ve D\u0131\u015fa Ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00dcretim Yap\u0131lar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Geri kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k, yaln\u0131zca ekonomik g\u00f6stergelerle de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda siyasal temsil, pazarl\u0131k g\u00fcc\u00fc, haklara eri\u015fim ve kamusal kaynak da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 gibi alanlarda kurumsal t\u0131kanmay\u0131 da i\u00e7erir. D\u00fcnya-sistem teorisi, geri kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 merkez-\u00e7evre ili\u015fkileri, d\u0131\u015f ticaret hadleri, teknoloji ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve de\u011fer zincirlerindeki konum \u00fczerinden a\u00e7\u0131klar. Merkez \u00fclkeler, y\u00fcksek katma de\u011ferli \u00fcretim ve sermaye birikimiyle \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131karken; \u00e7evre \u00fclkeler d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck katma de\u011ferli, emek yo\u011fun ve d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131yla sistemin periferisinde kal\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye gibi yar\u0131-\u00e7evre \u00fclkelerde, d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131 ve k\u0131r\u0131lgan kurumlar, yoksullu\u011fun ve gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin s\u00fcreklili\u011finde belirleyici rol oynar.<\/p>\n Kurumsal \u0130ktisat Perspektifi<\/strong><\/p>\n Kurumsal iktisat, yoksullu\u011fun s\u00fcreklili\u011fini \u201ck\u00f6t\u00fc talih\u201dten ziyade, \u00e7\u0131kar koalisyonlar\u0131n\u0131n kurumlar\u0131 kendi lehine kilitlemesiyle a\u00e7\u0131klar. Kapsay\u0131c\u0131 kurumlar geni\u015f kesimlerin ekonomik hayata kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ve yenilik\u00e7ili\u011fi te\u015fvik ederken; \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131c\u0131 kurumlar de\u011feri dar bir elit \u00e7evrede yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. Kurumlar\u0131n tasar\u0131m\u0131, zenginli\u011fin \u00fcretimi, b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc ve yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirleyici olur. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de kurumsal yap\u0131daki t\u0131kanmalar, yoksullu\u011fun ve gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin kal\u0131c\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n Sembolik \u015eiddet, Habitus ve Me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rma Anlat\u0131lar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Pierre Bourdieu\u2019n\u00fcn sembolik \u015fiddet kavram\u0131, toplumsal e\u015fitsizliklerin yaln\u0131zca ekonomik ve siyasal ara\u00e7larla de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda me\u015fru ve do\u011fal kabul edilen sembolik d\u00fczeneklerle yeniden \u00fcretildi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. Habitus, bireylerin toplumsal ko\u015fullara uyum sa\u011flayan davran\u0131\u015f kal\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7selle\u015ftirmesini; sembolik \u015fiddet ise bu kal\u0131plar\u0131n sorgulanmadan kabul edilmesini ifade eder. Yoksullar, kendi durumlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201cdo\u011fal\u201d veya \u201cka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz\u201d olarak alg\u0131layabilir; bu da e\u015fitsizli\u011fin sorgulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r.<\/p>\n Teodise, Dinin ve K\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn Ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Max Weber ve Peter Berger\u2019in teodise kavram\u0131, toplumsal e\u015fitsizliklerin ve yoksullu\u011fun ilahi adalet, kader veya toplumsal d\u00fczenin gere\u011fi olarak me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klar. Dinin ve k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, yoksullu\u011fun \u201ckader\u201d veya \u201cimtihan\u201d olarak sunulmas\u0131, bireylerin mevcut durumu sorgulama e\u011filimini zay\u0131flatabilir. Bu t\u00fcr me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rma anlat\u0131lar\u0131, yoksullu\u011fun toplumsal k\u00f6kenlerini g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez k\u0131larak, yap\u0131sal d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm taleplerini geciktirebilir.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de 2026 Y\u0131l\u0131 Asgari \u00dccret, A\u00e7l\u0131k ve Yoksulluk S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131: G\u00fcncel Veriler ve Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 Analiz<\/strong><\/p>\n 2026 Y\u0131l\u0131 Asgari \u00dccret Verileri<\/strong><\/p>\n 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de asgari \u00fccret, \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 23 Aral\u0131k 2025\u2019te a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f ve 1 Ocak 2026\u2019dan itibaren ge\u00e7erli olmak \u00fczere net 28.075,50 TL, br\u00fct 33.030,00 TL olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Asgari \u00fccretin i\u015fverene maliyeti ise sekt\u00f6rlere g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fmekle birlikte, imalat sekt\u00f6r\u00fc d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayl\u0131k 40.214,03 TL, imalat sekt\u00f6r\u00fcnde ise 39.223,13 TL\u2019dir. 2026 y\u0131l\u0131nda asgari \u00fccret deste\u011fi ayl\u0131k 1.270 TL olarak uygulanacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki tablo, 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 asgari \u00fccretin temel parametrelerini \u00f6zetlemektedir:<\/p>\n Bu veriler, asgari \u00fccretin yaln\u0131zca \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n de\u011fil, i\u015fverenlerin maliyet yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 ve istihdam kararlar\u0131n\u0131 da do\u011frudan etkiledi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e A\u00e7l\u0131k ve Yoksulluk S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 (Aral\u0131k 2025\/2026)<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e\u2019in Aral\u0131k 2025 verilerine g\u00f6re, Ankara\u2019da ya\u015fayan d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131, dengeli ve yeterli beslenebilmesi i\u00e7in yapmas\u0131 gereken ayl\u0131k g\u0131da harcamas\u0131 tutar\u0131 (a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131) 30.143 TL\u2019ye y\u00fckselmi\u015ftir. G\u0131da ile birlikte di\u011fer t\u00fcm temel harcamalar i\u00e7in haneye girmesi gereken toplam gelir tutar\u0131 (yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131) ise 98.188 TL olarak hesaplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bek\u00e2r bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ayl\u0131k ya\u015fama maliyeti ise 39.123 TL\u2019dir. T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e\u2019in mutfak enflasyonu verileri, Aral\u0131k 2025 itibar\u0131yla ayl\u0131k %1,06, on iki ayl\u0131k %43, y\u0131ll\u0131k ortalama %40,15 art\u0131\u015f g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Bu tablo, 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in belirlenen asgari \u00fccretin, d\u00f6rt ki\u015filik bir ailenin a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n dahi alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131yla ise aras\u0131nda \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck bir u\u00e7urum oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Bek\u00e2r bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ya\u015fama maliyeti de asgari \u00fccretin yakla\u015f\u0131k 11 bin TL \u00fczerindedir.<\/p>\n Enflasyon ve Ge\u00e7im Maliyeti Dinamikleri (2025-2026)<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de 2025 y\u0131l\u0131 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131 itibar\u0131yla y\u0131ll\u0131k T\u00dcFE (T\u00fcketici Fiyat Endeksi) art\u0131\u015f\u0131 %30,89 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. G\u0131da ve alkols\u00fcz i\u00e7eceklerde y\u0131ll\u0131k art\u0131\u015f %28,31, konutta %49,45, ula\u015ft\u0131rmada %28,44 olarak kaydedilmi\u015ftir. On iki ayl\u0131k ortalamalara g\u00f6re T\u00dcFE art\u0131\u015f\u0131 ise %34,88\u2019dir.<\/p>\n Enflasyonun y\u00fcksek seyretmesi, asgari \u00fccrette yap\u0131lan nominal art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n reel al\u0131m g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc h\u0131zla a\u015f\u0131nd\u0131rmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in asgari \u00fccrette yap\u0131lan %27\u2019lik art\u0131\u015f, 2025 y\u0131l\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen enflasyonun alt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum, asgari \u00fccretin daha y\u0131l ba\u015flamadan reel olarak gerilemesine neden olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan Yoksullu\u011fu ve Ge\u00e7im Maliyeti: S\u00fcreklilik Mekanizmalar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan Yoksullu\u011fu: Kavramsal ve Ampirik Boyut<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011fu, bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda ya\u015fayan bireyleri ifade eder. Bu olgu, yaln\u0131zca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretlerle de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda g\u00fcvencesiz istihdam, kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, sosyal koruma eksikli\u011fi ve hanehalk\u0131 gelirinin yetersizli\u011fiyle de ili\u015fkilidir. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011fu, \u00f6zellikle asgari \u00fccretin yayg\u0131n bir referans \u00fccrete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesiyle birlikte, geni\u015f toplumsal kesimler i\u00e7in kal\u0131c\u0131 bir risk haline gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e ve T\u00dc\u0130K verileri, asgari \u00fccretin a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n dahi alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yoksulluk s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131yla ise aras\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir u\u00e7urum oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu durum, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamakta zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bor\u00e7lanma, ek i\u015f yapma veya sosyal yard\u0131mlara ba\u015fvurma gibi stratejilere y\u00f6neldi\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n Reel \u00dccret Dinamikleri ve Enflasyonun Etkisi<\/strong><\/p>\n Reel \u00fccret, nominal \u00fccretin enflasyonla d\u00fczeltilmi\u015f halidir ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek al\u0131m g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6sterir. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de 2025-2026 d\u00f6neminde y\u00fcksek enflasyon, asgari \u00fccretteki art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n reel olarak h\u0131zla erimesine neden olmu\u015ftur. 2026 y\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda yap\u0131lan %27\u2019lik asgari \u00fccret art\u0131\u015f\u0131, 2025 y\u0131l\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen enflasyonun (%30,89) alt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f; asgari \u00fccret daha y\u0131l ba\u015flamadan reel olarak gerilemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Bu tablo, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011funun yaln\u0131zca d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretlerle de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda enflasyonun y\u00fcksek seyri ve ge\u00e7im maliyetindeki art\u0131\u015flarla da s\u00fcreklilik kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermektedir. \u00d6zellikle g\u0131da, konut ve ula\u015ft\u0131rma gibi temel harcama kalemlerindeki y\u00fcksek fiyat art\u0131\u015flar\u0131, asgari \u00fccretli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ya\u015fam standartlar\u0131n\u0131 ciddi bi\u00e7imde tehdit etmektedir.<\/p>\n Emek Piyasas\u0131nda G\u00fcvencesizle\u015fme ve \u0130stihdam Yap\u0131s\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de emek piyasas\u0131, son y\u0131llarda artan esneklik, kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131k ve g\u00fcvencesiz \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma bi\u00e7imleriyle karakterize edilmektedir. Neo-liberal ekonomi politikalar\u0131, i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc maliyetlerini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek ve sermayenin esnekli\u011fini art\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla, esnek \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma bi\u00e7imlerini ve g\u00fcvencesiz istihdam\u0131 yayg\u0131nla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. K\u0131smi s\u00fcreli, belirli s\u00fcreli, ge\u00e7ici ve kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 istihdam bi\u00e7imleri, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n sosyal g\u00fcvenlikten ve sendikal haklardan mahrum kalmas\u0131na, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretlerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na ve yoksulluk riskinin artmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n OECD ve IMF raporlar\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc piyasas\u0131n\u0131n esnekle\u015fmesine ra\u011fmen, kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 istihdam\u0131n ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretli i\u015flerin yayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu durumun gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011fini ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011funu derinle\u015ftirdi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n \u00c7\u0131kar Koalisyonlar\u0131, Sermaye ve Yeniden B\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm Mekanizmalar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Kurumsal iktisat perspektifine g\u00f6re, \u00e7\u0131kar koalisyonlar\u0131 ve sermaye gruplar\u0131, kurumlar\u0131 kendi lehlerine kilitleyerek zenginli\u011fin ve kaynaklar\u0131n belirli kesimlerde yo\u011funla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de de sermaye gruplar\u0131n\u0131n, kamu ihaleleri, te\u015fvikler, vergi muafiyetleri ve reg\u00fclasyon avantajlar\u0131 yoluyla art\u0131 de\u011feri kendi lehlerine yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131; buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00fccretli eme\u011fin milli gelirden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 pay\u0131n geriledi\u011fi g\u00f6zlenmektedir.<\/p>\n Yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm mekanizmalar\u0131n\u0131n zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131, sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131n ve transferlerin yetersizli\u011fi, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin ve yoksullu\u011fun s\u00fcreklili\u011finde belirleyici rol oynamaktad\u0131r. OECD ve IMF bulgular\u0131, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi olumsuz etkiledi\u011fini, yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm politikalar\u0131n\u0131n ise b\u00fcy\u00fcme kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 olmak zorunda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n Yoksullu\u011fun Me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve Y\u00f6netimi: Sembolik \u015eiddet, Teodise ve K\u00fclt\u00fcrel Anlat\u0131lar<\/strong><\/p>\n Sembolik \u015eiddet ve Habitus (Bourdieu)<\/strong><\/p>\n Pierre Bourdieu\u2019n\u00fcn sembolik \u015fiddet kavram\u0131, toplumsal e\u015fitsizliklerin yaln\u0131zca ekonomik ve siyasal ara\u00e7larla de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda me\u015fru ve do\u011fal kabul edilen sembolik d\u00fczeneklerle yeniden \u00fcretildi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. Habitus, bireylerin toplumsal ko\u015fullara uyum sa\u011flayan davran\u0131\u015f kal\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7selle\u015ftirmesini; sembolik \u015fiddet ise bu kal\u0131plar\u0131n sorgulanmadan kabul edilmesini ifade eder. Yoksullar, kendi durumlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201cdo\u011fal\u201d veya \u201cka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz\u201d olarak alg\u0131layabilir; bu da e\u015fitsizli\u011fin sorgulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r.<\/p>\n Sembolik \u015fiddet, e\u011fitim, medya, din ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel pratikler yoluyla toplumsal d\u00fczenin me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda ve yoksullu\u011fun \u201cdo\u011fal\u201d bir durum olarak kabul edilmesinde \u00f6nemli rol oynar. Bourdieu\u2019n\u00fcn analizine g\u00f6re, toplumsal s\u0131n\u0131f e\u015fitsizli\u011finin me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, bilin\u00e7li bireysel eylemlerden ziyade alanlardaki uyuma ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r; failler, kendilerine a\u00e7\u0131k olan f\u0131rsatlar ve engeller kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda belli t\u00fcrden davranmaya y\u00f6nelik stratejiler geli\u015ftirirken, fark\u0131nda olmadan s\u0131n\u0131fsal ayr\u0131mlar\u0131 yeniden \u00fcretirler.<\/p>\n Teodise, Dinin ve K\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn Ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Max Weber ve Peter Berger\u2019in teodise kavram\u0131, toplumsal e\u015fitsizliklerin ve yoksullu\u011fun ilahi adalet, kader veya toplumsal d\u00fczenin gere\u011fi olarak me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klar. Dinin ve k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, yoksullu\u011fun \u201ckader\u201d veya \u201cimtihan\u201d olarak sunulmas\u0131, bireylerin mevcut durumu sorgulama e\u011filimini zay\u0131flatabilir. Bu t\u00fcr me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rma anlat\u0131lar\u0131, yoksullu\u011fun toplumsal k\u00f6kenlerini g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez k\u0131larak, yap\u0131sal d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm taleplerini geciktirebilir.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de de \u201csab\u0131r\u201d, \u201c\u015f\u00fck\u00fcr\u201d ve \u201ckader\u201d s\u00f6ylemleri, yoksullu\u011fun toplumsal k\u00f6kenlerini g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez k\u0131lmakta; hak temelli taleplerin yerine yard\u0131m\/ba\u011f\u0131\u015f temelli ili\u015fkilerin \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. Bu durum, yoksullu\u011fun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gereken bir sorun olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131p, y\u00f6netilmesi gereken bir kitleye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine hizmet edebilir.<\/p>\n D\u00fcnya-Sistem Teorisi ve D\u0131\u015fa Ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00dcretim Yap\u0131lar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n D\u00fcnya-Sistem Teorisi: Merkez-\u00c7evre \u0130li\u015fkileri<\/strong><\/p>\n Immanuel Wallerstein\u2019\u0131n d\u00fcnya-sistem teorisi, kapitalist d\u00fcnya ekonomisinin merkez, yar\u0131-\u00e7evre ve \u00e7evre \u00fclkeler aras\u0131nda hiyerar\u015fik bir i\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle organize oldu\u011funu savunur. Merkez \u00fclkeler, y\u00fcksek katma de\u011ferli \u00fcretim ve sermaye birikimiyle \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131karken; \u00e7evre \u00fclkeler d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck katma de\u011ferli, emek yo\u011fun ve d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131yla sistemin periferisinde kal\u0131r. Yar\u0131-\u00e7evre \u00fclkeler ise hem emek g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn kayna\u011f\u0131 hem de d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck k\u00e2r oranl\u0131 end\u00fcstrilerin \u00fcstlenicisi olarak i\u015flev g\u00f6r\u00fcr.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye, d\u00fcnya-sistem teorisinde genellikle yar\u0131-\u00e7evre \u00fclke olarak konumland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. D\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131, teknoloji transferi eksikli\u011fi, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck katma de\u011ferli ihracat ve k\u0131r\u0131lgan kurumlar, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de yoksullu\u011fun ve gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin s\u00fcreklili\u011finde belirleyici rol oynar. Merkez \u00fclkelerle olan ticaret ili\u015fkileri, art\u0131 de\u011ferin merkezde yo\u011funla\u015fmas\u0131na ve \u00e7evre \u00fclkelerde yoksullu\u011fun kal\u0131c\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7ar.<\/p>\n D\u0131\u015fa Ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00dcretim ve \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan Yoksullu\u011fu<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretli ve g\u00fcvencesiz istihdam bi\u00e7imlerinin yayg\u0131nla\u015fmas\u0131na neden olmu\u015ftur. Emek yo\u011fun sekt\u00f6rlerde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretler, kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 istihdam ve sosyal koruma eksikli\u011fi, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011funu derinle\u015ftirmektedir. D\u00fcnya-sistem teorisi, bu yap\u0131sal ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yaln\u0131zca ekonomik de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda siyasal ve kurumsal dinamiklerle de s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc vurgular.<\/p>\n OECD ve IMF Bulgular\u0131: E\u015fitsizlik, Yoksulluk ve B\u00fcy\u00fcme \u0130li\u015fkisi<\/strong><\/p>\n OECD Bulgular\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n OECD \u00fclkelerinde gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011fi ve yoksulluk, ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcme \u00fczerinde olumsuz etkiye sahiptir. OECD\u2019nin bulgular\u0131na g\u00f6re, en zengin %10\u2019luk kesim, en yoksul %10\u2019luk kesimin 9,5 kat\u0131 gelir elde etmektedir; bu oran 1980\u2019lerde 7,1 idi ve zamanla artm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011findeki %1\u2019lik art\u0131\u015f, ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi yakla\u015f\u0131k %0,8 azaltmakta; yoksulluktaki %1\u2019lik art\u0131\u015f ise b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi %0,17 oran\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n OECD raporlar\u0131, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k, ya\u015fam beklentisi, yat\u0131r\u0131mlar ve be\u015feri sermaye birikimi gibi kanallar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi olumsuz etkiledi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. Y\u00fcksek e\u015fitsizlik, toplumsal huzursuzlu\u011fu art\u0131rmakta, siyasi belirsizli\u011fi y\u00fckseltmekte ve yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131 olumsuz etkilemektedir. Ayr\u0131ca, kredi piyasalar\u0131ndaki asimetriler, yoksullar\u0131n be\u015feri ve fiziksel sermayeye yat\u0131r\u0131m yapmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyerek uzun vadeli b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n IMF Bulgular\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n IMF\u2019nin 2026 D\u00fcnya Ekonomik G\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm Raporu\u2019na g\u00f6re, T\u00fcrkiye ekonomisinin 2026 y\u0131l\u0131nda %4,2 oran\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fcmesi beklenmektedir. Ancak, y\u00fcksek enflasyon, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011fi ve sosyal koruma eksikli\u011fi, b\u00fcy\u00fcmenin toplumsal refaha yans\u0131mas\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamaktad\u0131r. IMF, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin azalt\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcme i\u00e7in kritik oldu\u011funu, yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm politikalar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fcme kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 olmak zorunda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n OECD ve IMF, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131n ve transferlerin yetersizli\u011fine, vergi sisteminin dolayl\u0131 vergilere dayal\u0131 olmas\u0131na ve sosyal koruma a\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekmektedir. Bu durum, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin ve yoksullu\u011fun s\u00fcreklili\u011finde belirleyici rol oynamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de Gelir Da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131, E\u015fitsizlik ve Sosyal Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k<\/strong><\/p>\n Gelir Da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ve E\u015fitsizlik G\u00f6stergeleri<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de gelir da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131, OECD \u00fclkeleri aras\u0131nda en adaletsiz olanlardan biridir. 2024 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla Gini katsay\u0131s\u0131 0,413 olarak hesaplanm\u0131\u015f; en y\u00fcksek gelirli %20\u2019lik kesim toplam gelirin %48,1\u2019ini, en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck gelirli %20\u2019lik kesim ise yaln\u0131zca %6,3\u2019\u00fcn\u00fc almaktad\u0131r. P80\/P20 oran\u0131 ise 7,7\u2019dir; bu, en y\u00fcksek gelir grubunun en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck gelir grubuna g\u00f6re 7,7 kat daha fazla gelir elde etti\u011fini g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n OECD ortalamas\u0131nda Gini katsay\u0131s\u0131 genellikle 0,25\u20130,35 aral\u0131\u011f\u0131ndad\u0131r; T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin de\u011feri ise bu ortalaman\u0131n olduk\u00e7a \u00fczerindedir. B\u00f6lgesel e\u015fitsizlikler, e\u011fitim ve istihdam olanaklar\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131klar, kay\u0131t d\u0131\u015f\u0131 istihdam ve vergi politikalar\u0131, gelir da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131ndaki adaletsizli\u011fin temel nedenlerindendir.<\/p>\n Sosyal Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ve Yeniden B\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm Politikalar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n Sosyal vatanda\u015fl\u0131k, bireylerin yaln\u0131zca hukuki de\u011fil, ekonomik ve sosyal haklara da sahip olmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de sosyal yard\u0131mlar ve transferler, yoksullu\u011fun ve gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin azalt\u0131lmas\u0131nda yetersiz kalmaktad\u0131r. OECD ve IMF, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de sosyal koruma a\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n dar kapsaml\u0131 ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck d\u00fczeyde oldu\u011funu, sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131n ve transferlerin toplam kamu harcamalar\u0131 i\u00e7indeki pay\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini vurgulamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n Vergi sisteminin dolayl\u0131 vergilere (KDV, \u00d6TV) dayal\u0131 olmas\u0131, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck gelirli gruplar\u0131n \u00fczerindeki vergi y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc art\u0131rmakta; gelir \u00fczerinden al\u0131nan dolays\u0131z vergilerin oran\u0131 ise nispeten d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckt\u00fcr. Bu durum, gelir da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131ndaki adaletsizli\u011fi derinle\u015ftirmektedir.<\/p>\n Politika \u00d6nerileri: K\u0131sa, Orta ve Uzun Vadeli Tedbirler<\/strong><\/p>\n K\u0131sa Vadeli Tedbirler<\/strong><\/p>\n Orta Vadeli Tedbirler<\/strong><\/p>\n Uzun Vadeli Tedbirler<\/strong><\/p>\n Sonu\u00e7: Yoksullu\u011fun S\u00fcreklili\u011fi ve Adil Bir Toplumsal D\u00fczen \u0130\u00e7in Yol Haritas\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de yoksullu\u011fun ve geri kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcreklili\u011fi, yaln\u0131zca kaynak k\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcme eksikli\u011fiyle a\u00e7\u0131klanamaz. Zenginli\u011fin \u00fcretimi, b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc ve yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc belirleyen kurumsal ve siyasal iktidar ili\u015fkileri, yoksullu\u011fun kal\u0131c\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131nda ve me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda temel rol oynamaktad\u0131r. Asgari \u00fccretin a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n dahi alt\u0131nda kalmas\u0131, y\u00fcksek enflasyon ve ge\u00e7im maliyeti, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011funun s\u00fcreklili\u011fini beslemektedir.<\/p>\n Kurumsal iktisat, d\u00fcnya-sistem teorisi, sembolik \u015fiddet ve teodise gibi teorik \u00e7er\u00e7eveler, yoksullu\u011fun yaln\u0131zca ekonomik de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda toplumsal, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ve siyasal mekanizmalarla da yeniden \u00fcretildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. OECD ve IMF bulgular\u0131, gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcmeyi olumsuz etkiledi\u011fini, yeniden b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm politikalar\u0131n\u0131n ise b\u00fcy\u00fcme kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 olmak zorunda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n Adil ve s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilir bir toplumsal d\u00fczen i\u00e7in, asgari \u00fccretin ve sosyal yard\u0131mlar\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, vergi reformu, e\u011fitim ve be\u015feri sermaye yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131, kad\u0131n istihdam\u0131n\u0131n te\u015fviki, kurumsal reformlar ve d\u0131\u015fa ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00fcretim yap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi gerekmektedir. Sosyal vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ve hak temelli politikalar, yoksullu\u011fun ve gelir e\u015fitsizli\u011finin azalt\u0131lmas\u0131nda temel ara\u00e7lar olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Sonu\u00e7 olarak, yoksullu\u011fun ve geri kalm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcreklili\u011fiyle m\u00fccadele, yaln\u0131zca ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcme de\u011fil, adil b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm, kapsay\u0131c\u0131 kurumlar ve toplumsal dayan\u0131\u015fma temelinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir. Bu, hem toplumsal refah\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hem de s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilir kalk\u0131nman\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ertelenemez bir ihtiya\u00e7t\u0131r.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de yoksulluk art\u0131k kaynak k\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan de\u011fil, zenginli\u011fin nas\u0131l payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve kurumlar\u0131n bu payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nas\u0131l kilitledi\u011finden besleniyor; asgar\u00ee \u00fccretin a\u00e7l\u0131k s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir d\u00fczende \u2018\u00e7al\u0131\u015fan yoksullu\u011fu\u2019 kal\u0131c\u0131la\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3002,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analiz"],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n
\n Kategori<\/strong><\/td>\n Tutar (TL)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Br\u00fct Asgari \u00dccret<\/td>\n 33.030,00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Net Asgari \u00dccret<\/td>\n 28.075,50<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n SGK Primi (\u0130\u015f\u00e7i Pay\u0131, %14)<\/td>\n 4.624,20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fsizlik Sigortas\u0131 (\u0130\u015f\u00e7i, %1)<\/td>\n 330,30<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fveren SGK Primi (\u0130malat, %16,75)<\/td>\n 5.532,53<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fveren SGK Primi (Di\u011fer, %19,75)<\/td>\n 6.523,43<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fveren \u0130\u015fsizlik Sigortas\u0131 (%2)<\/td>\n 660,60<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fverene Toplam Maliyet (\u0130malat)<\/td>\n 39.223,13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u0130\u015fverene Toplam Maliyet (Di\u011fer)<\/td>\n 40.214,03<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Asgari \u00dccret Deste\u011fi<\/td>\n 1.270,00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n\n
\n G\u00f6sterge<\/strong><\/td>\n Tutar (TL)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n A\u00e7l\u0131k S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 (4 ki\u015filik aile)<\/td>\n 30.143<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Yoksulluk S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 (4 ki\u015filik aile)<\/td>\n 98.188<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Bek\u00e2r \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n Ya\u015fam Maliyeti<\/td>\n 39.123<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2026 Net Asgari \u00dccret<\/td>\n 28.075,50<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n\n
\n G\u00f6sterge<\/strong><\/td>\n Oran (%)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Y\u0131ll\u0131k T\u00dcFE (Aral\u0131k 2025)<\/td>\n 30,89<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n G\u0131da ve Alkols\u00fcz \u0130\u00e7ecekler<\/td>\n 28,31<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Konut<\/td>\n 49,45<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Ula\u015ft\u0131rma<\/td>\n 28,44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n On \u0130ki Ayl\u0131k Ortalama T\u00dcFE<\/td>\n 34,88<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n
\n
\n